Abstract
Olaparib (O) + ceralasertib (C) in patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC): Translational analysis of the VIOLETTE trial.
Author
person
Natalia Lukashchuk
AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
info_outline
Natalia Lukashchuk, Kevin Punie, Zbigniew Nowecki, Seock-Ah Im, Anne C. Armstrong, William Jacot, Jee Hyun Kim, Marc A. Webster, Judith Balmaña, Suzette Delaloge, Ed Casson, Bienvenu Loembe, Emma Dean, Joshua Armenia, Andrew NJ Tutt
Full text
Authors
person
Natalia Lukashchuk
AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
info_outline
Natalia Lukashchuk, Kevin Punie, Zbigniew Nowecki, Seock-Ah Im, Anne C. Armstrong, William Jacot, Jee Hyun Kim, Marc A. Webster, Judith Balmaña, Suzette Delaloge, Ed Casson, Bienvenu Loembe, Emma Dean, Joshua Armenia, Andrew NJ Tutt
Organizations
AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, The Maria Sklodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, AstraZeneca, Oss, Netherlands, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
Abstract Disclosures
Research Funding
Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AstraZeneca
Background:
O is a PARP inhibitor approved in a number of tumor types and for use in pts with germline (g) mutations in
BRCA
(
BRCA
m) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. C is an inhibitor of DDR kinase ATR. Analysis of VIOLETTE (NCT03330847) in pts with mTNBC showed no improvement in PFS with a combination of C and O vs. O, whether in the context of pathogenic BRCAm, non-BRCA HRR pathway mutations (HRRm), or homologous recombination repair (HRR) wildtype (HRRwt) tumors. We report an exploratory translational analysis of predictive genomic biomarkers of response to O ± C beyond g
BRCA
m.
Methods:
Pts received O (300 mg twice daily) ± C (160 mg daily; days 1–7; 28-day cycles) as a second- or third-line treatment option. Pts were prospectively stratified into molecular strata based on pathogenic/likely pathogenic alterations in
BRCA
1/2 (
BRCA
m; n=83) or in ≥1 of 13 selected non-
BRCA
HRR genes (HRRm; n=40) or HRRwt (n=103) using FoundationOneCDx (F1CDx) sequencing assay of archival tumor sample. Advanced genomic analysis included genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (a marker of HRR deficiency [HRD] with a 16% cut-off to define HRD+ [≥16%] vs HRD− [<16%]), zygosity, and predicted g/somatic (s) status of
BRCA
and HRR alterations based on a validated computational FMI algorithm. Efficacy was evaluated by blinded independent central review of PFS, RECIST response, and best percentage change from baseline in target lesion size.
Results:
Out of evaluable pts for origin of
BRCA
m (n=42), 81% (n=34) were of germline, and 19% (n=8) were of somatic origin. Of pts evaluable for zygosity (n=48), most
BRCA
alterations were biallelic (90%; n=43), and of pts evaluable for HRD status (n=47), most were HRD+ (94%; n=44). Of HRRwt pts evaluable for HRD status (n=79), 57% were HRD+ (n=45). Responses by biomarker are shown. Responses in
BRCA
m pts were seen in all subgroups (zygosity, HRD, or g/s origin of mutation), including s
BRCA
m (ORR: n=3/4 on O; n=2/4 on O+C). Responses were also seen in patients with heterozygous
BRCA
alteration (n=3/5) by genomic result and in
BRCA
m/HRD− pts (n=3/3) across both arms. Pts with select HRR genes (
BARD1
,
RAD51C/D, ATM, CDK12
) also achieved responses on O or O+C.
Conclusions:
Responses to O were seen in pts with both g
BRCA
m and s
BRCA
m. Beyond
BRCA
m, the efficacy of O was observed in pts with alterations in select HRR genes, such as
BARD1
or
RAD51C/D
; further clinical investigation is required. Small sample size and HRD analysis performed on archival tumor samples should be considered limitations. Clinical trial information: NCT03330847.
Overall response rate in selected biomarker subsets; n/N (%).
Strata
Subgroup
O
O+C
BRCA
m
Predicted s
BRCA
m
3/4 (75)
2/4 (50)
Predicted g
BRCA
m
9/16 (56)
8/18 (44)
Unknown
7/23 (30)
10/18 (56)
HRRm
BARD1
m
2/3 (67)
0/1 (0)
RAD51
C/
D
m
1/3 (33)
2/2 (100)
ATM
m
0/3 (0)
1/4 (25)
CDK12
(co-occurring
PPP2R2A
)
0/1 (0)
1/3 (33)
HRRwt
HRD+
2/22 (9)
4/23 (17)
HRD−
0/17 (0)
1/17 (6)
10 organizations
2 drugs
8 targets
Organization
AstraZenecaOrganization
University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumOrganization
Seoul National University College of MedicineOrganization
Institut du Cancer de MontpellierOrganization
Tom Baker Cancer CenterOrganization
The Institute of Cancer ResearchDrug
mFOLFOX6Drug
lenalidomideTarget
ATMTarget
CDK12Target
RAD51DTarget
BRCA2Target
RAD51CTarget
BARD1Target
BRCA1