Abstract
A step toward genomic equity: Mutational profiling of patients with myeloid neoplasm in the largest minority-serving hospital in metropolitan Chicago.
Author
person
Maha AT Elsebaie
John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL
info_outline
Maha AT Elsebaie, Ekrem Turk, Vaishali Deenadayalan, Khaldun Obeidat, Ahmad Nanaa, Maryam Zia, Noah W. Birch
Full text
Authors
person
Maha AT Elsebaie
John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL
info_outline
Maha AT Elsebaie, Ekrem Turk, Vaishali Deenadayalan, Khaldun Obeidat, Ahmad Nanaa, Maryam Zia, Noah W. Birch
Organizations
John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL
Abstract Disclosures
Research Funding
No funding received
None.
Background:
Information on genomic landscape of myeloid neoplasms comes from large studies of patients with predominantly European ancestry. Minority-serving hospitals offer unique opportunities to study ethnically diverse populations.
Methods:
In this retrospective study at the Stroger Hospital of Cook County, we included patients ≥18 years old with myeloid neoplasms or premalignant conditions who underwent mutational profiling via next generation sequencing (NGS). We utilized two commercially available myeloid panels: “
FoundationOneHeme
” (406 gene panel) and “
Tempus”
(648 gene panel)
.
Patient demographics were collected, including self-reported race/ethnicity. We compared data distribution using Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson’s χ2, or Fisher’s exact tests. Overall survival (OS) probabilities were compared using the log-rank test.
Results:
Ninety-four patients underwent NGS between 04/01/2020 and 12/31/2022, including 45 females (47.9%). 38 patients (40.4%) identified as Black, 28 (29.8%) as White, and 28 (29.8%) as Other (10.6% Asian, 9.6% Mexican/South American, and 9.6% undetermined). 30 patients (32%) identified as Hispanic and 64 (68%) as Non-Hispanic. Diagnoses included Acute myeloid leukemia (AML, 32%), Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS, 13%), MDS/MPN overlap syndrome (7%), and Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (7%). Eighty-eight patients had at least one pathogenic variant and harbored 259 mutations in 74 genes. Commonly mutated genes were
ASXL1
(23%),
JAK2
(17%),
DNMT3A
(14%), and
TET2
(13%).Non-White patients were more likely to have
IDH2
mutations (5% Black vs. 0% White vs. vs. 14% Other races,
p
=0.011). Mutation count didn’t differ between racial
p
=0.525 or ethnic groups
p
=0.345.
AML & MDS patients were more likely to have
TET2
,
RUNX1
,
TP53
, and
IDH2
mutations. In addition, 24% of AML & MDS patients had mutated
ASXL1
.
TET2, SRSF2, and RUNX1
mutations were common among MDS/MPN patients (Table). AML & MDS patients had poor OS, but OS didn’t differ between racial/ethnic groups.
Conclusions:
Premalignant mutations (e.g.,
ASXL1, TET2
) predominated in our patients and tended to co-occur, increasing the overall mutational burden. Non-White patients were more likely to have IDH2 mutations. Adverse markers were common among AML & MDS patients, likely contributing to their dismal survival. Studies inclusive of ethnically diverse patients are needed to accurately translate genetic findings into clinical practice. This report from a large, minority-serving hospital represents a step toward promoting genomic and healthcare equity.
Distribution of mutations by diagnosis.
AML & MDS
MDS/MPN
MPN
p
-value
ASXL1
Mut
10
3
8
0.483
TET2
Mut
5
3
3
0.040
SRSF2
Mut
5
5
1
0.001
RUNX1
Mut
6
2
0
0.009
TP53
Mut
8
0
0
0.011
IDH2
Mut
6
0
0
0.035
FLT3
Mut
5
0
0
0.131
1 organization
9 drugs
9 targets
Drug
ASXL1Drug
JAK2Drug
DNMT3ADrug
TET2Drug
IDH2Drug
RUNx1T1Drug
TP53Drug
SRSF2Drug
FLT3Target
ASXL1Target
TP53Target
DNMT3ATarget
TET2Target
RUNx1T1Target
SRSF2Target
FLT3Target
JAK2Target
IDH2