Abstract
Outcome of TP53-mutated CCUS and the risk of progression to myeloid neoplasms.
Author
person
Syed Naseem Shah
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
info_outline
Syed Naseem Shah, Marissa Li, Anmol Baranwal, Dong Chen, Rong He, Hassan B. Alkhateeb, Ayalew Tefferi, Abhishek A Mangaonkar, Aref Al-Kali, Mrinal S Patnaik, Mithun Vinod Shah
Full text
Authors
person
Syed Naseem Shah
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
info_outline
Syed Naseem Shah, Marissa Li, Anmol Baranwal, Dong Chen, Rong He, Hassan B. Alkhateeb, Ayalew Tefferi, Abhishek A Mangaonkar, Aref Al-Kali, Mrinal S Patnaik, Mithun Vinod Shah
Organizations
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Abstract Disclosures
Research Funding
No funding received
None.
Background:
TP53
-mutated (
TP53
mut
) myeloid neoplasms (MN) are aggressive leukemia with poor survival. A subset of
TP53
mut
MN is preceded by
TP53
mut
CCUS that is conventionally considered to be high-risk premalignant condition, though evidence supporting the notion is lacking. We studied outcomes of
TP53
mut
CCUS compared to
TP53
wild-type (
TP53
wt
) CCUS.
Methods:
Mayo Clinic Molecular Hematology Database (N=7593) was queried to identify patients (pts) harboring pathogenic variant(s) in exons 4-11 of the
TP53
gene with ≥2% variance allele frequency (VAF).
CCUS was defined using the 5
th
edition of the WHO Classification for MN.
Results:
Of 457 pts with
TP53
mut
, 29 (5.9%) had
TP53
mut
CCUS. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years, 17 (59%) were female, and 20 (69%) had received cytotoxic therapies. One and ≥2
TP53
mut
were seen in 26 (89.6%) and 3 (10.3%) pts, respectively. Median
TP53
mut
VAF was 9% (range 3-42), 3 had
TP53
mut
VAF ≥20%, and 4 (14%) had non-MDS defining cytogenetic anomalies. Of 16 pts with available follow up evaluation (median interval 22 months, Table), 3 (10.3%) progressed to
TP53
mut
MN at 5, 13, and 14 months from diagnosis. We next compared outcomes of
TP53
mut
CCUS to
TP53
wt
CCUS (n=138). The proportion of pts developing MN was not different between
TP53
wt
and
TP53
mut
CCUS (18.1
vs
10.3%,
P
= .42). Progression free survival of
TP53
mut
CCUS was comparable to
TP53
wt
CCUS at 1- (77
vs
83%), 2- (67
vs
67%), and 5-years (67
vs
59%,
P
=.9). Similarly, overall survival of
TP53
mut
vs
TP53
wt
CCUS at 1- (81
vs
89%), 2- (76
vs
76%), and 5-years (76
vs
67%) was comparable (
P
= .94).
Conclusions:
In contrast to the prevalent notion,
TP53
mut
was not associated with a higher risk of MN progression or mortality compared to
TP53
wt
CCUS. Majority of
TP53
mut
clones showed remarkable stability over years.
Pathologic characteristics of
TP53
mut
CCUS patients at baseline and last follow-up.
Age/Sex
Baseline
Last Follow-up
Interval (mo.)
Cytogenetics
NGS (% VAF)
Phenotype
Cytogenetics
NGS (% VAF)
72F
46, XX
TP53
(6)
t-MDS
45, XX, add (5) (q11.2), -7
TP53
(82)
14
73M
46, XY
PHF6
(12),
TP53
(7)
t-MDS
46, XY
13
61F
46, XX
TP53
(7.5),
TP53
(5.5)
t-MDS
46, XY,del(7)(q22)/47,idem,+21
5
65F
46, XX
TP53
(42),
IDH1
(38),
SRSF2
(43)
CCUS
46, XX
24
65M
46, XY
TP53
CCUS
46, XY
56
52F
46, XX
TP53
(10)
CCUS
46, XX
TP53
(8)
22
71M
46, XY
TP53
(6),
DNMT3A
(7),
JAK2 (
10)
CCUS
46, XY
TP53
(11),
DNMT3
(15),
JAK2
(6)
51
67M
45, X,Y,t(1;15)(q23;q15)
TP53
(9)
CCUS
45, X, -Y,t(1;15)(q23;q15)
22
71M
46, XY
TP53
(9)
CCUS
14
40F
46, XX
TP53
(13)
CCUS
46, XX
TP53
(16)
72
58F
46, XX
TP53
(19),
TET2
(17)
CCUS
46, XX
TP53
(24),
TET2
(21)
47
84F
46, XX
TP53
(37)
CCUS
46, XX,del(13)(q12q14)
TP53
(5)
18
65F
45, X, -X
TP53
(7)
CCUS
45, X, -X
TP53
(7)
30
16F
46, XX
TP53
(5)
CCUS
46, XX
TP53
(5),
TP53
(16)
19
52F
46, XX
TP53
(7)
CCUS
46, XX
43
60F
46, XX
TP53
(6),
TET2
(6)
CCUS
46, XX
4
CCUS: clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance, NGS: next-generation sequencing, F: female, M: male, t-MDS: therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome.
2 organizations
7 drugs
7 targets
Organization
Mayo ClinicDrug
TP53Drug
PHF6Drug
IDH1Drug
SRSF2Drug
DNMT3ADrug
JAK2Drug
TET2Target
IDH1Target
TP53Target
DNMT3ATarget
TET2Target
SRSF2Target
PHF6Target
JAK2