Abstract
Phase II trial of mini-hyper-CVD-inotuzumab (InO) followed by blinatumomab (blina) consolidation in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Author
person
Cedric Christophe Nasnas
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
info_outline
Cedric Christophe Nasnas, Elias Jabbour, Fadi Haddad, Nicholas James Short, Walid Macaron, Marianne Zoghbi, Lewis Fady Nasr, Nitin Jain, Emmanuel Almanza, Koji Sasaki, Farhad Ravandi, Partow Kebriaei, Xuelin Huang, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Tapan M. Kadia, Sa A Wang, Jovitta Jacob, Rebecca Garris, Susan M. O'Brien, Hagop M. Kantarjian
Full text
Authors
person
Cedric Christophe Nasnas
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
info_outline
Cedric Christophe Nasnas, Elias Jabbour, Fadi Haddad, Nicholas James Short, Walid Macaron, Marianne Zoghbi, Lewis Fady Nasr, Nitin Jain, Emmanuel Almanza, Koji Sasaki, Farhad Ravandi, Partow Kebriaei, Xuelin Huang, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Tapan M. Kadia, Sa A Wang, Jovitta Jacob, Rebecca Garris, Susan M. O'Brien, Hagop M. Kantarjian
Organizations
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, CA
Abstract Disclosures
Research Funding
Institutional Funding
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Amgen and pfizer
Background:
Promising results were seen with low intensity chemotherapy mini-Hyper-CVD (mini-HCVD) in combination with InO in R/R ALL. Adding blina may further improve outcomes.
Methods:
Pts with R/R Philadelphia-negative B-ALL were treated with mini-HCVD (Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) and methotrexate/cytarabine (Cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) for 8 cycles. Initially, InO was given on Day (D) 3 of the first 4 cycles at the dose of 1.8-1.3 mg/m
2
in Cycle (C) 1, followed by 1.3-1.0 mg/m
2
in subsequent cycles. POMP maintenance was for a total of 3 yrs. Protocol was amended after pt #67 to add 4 cycles of blina after 4 cycles of mini-HCVD+InO. InO was given on D2 and 8 at the dose of 0.6 and 0.3 mg/m
2
in C1, and then on D2 and 8 at the dose of 0.3 mg/m
2
in subsequent cycles; blina was given at standard dose in C5-8. Maintenance was reduced to 12 cycles of POMP with 1 cycle of blina after each 3 cycles of POMP for a total of 4 cycles. Rituximab was given for CD20+ disease. All pts received 8 doses of intrathecal chemotherapy.
Results:
Between 2/2013 and 7/2021, 110 pts were treated. Patient characteristics are shown in the table. 79 (72%) pts were treated in Salvage (S) 1, and 31 (28%) in S2+. 21 (19%) pts had received prior ASCT. 91 (83%) pts responded (complete remission, 63%). The overall response rate was 93% in S1, 59% in S2, and 57% in S3+. The rates of MRD negativity by flow were higher in S1 vs S2+ (89% vs 67%;
P=
0.047). 53 (48%) pts underwent ASCT. After a median follow-up of 48 months (mo) (range, 9-115), the median OS and RFS were 17 mo (4-yr, 36%) and 13 mo (4-yr, 37%), respectively. Pts in S1 had better OS compared with S2+ (4-yr OS, 43% vs 18%;
P
<0.001). The 4-yr RFS was 38% in S1 and 27% in S2+ (
P
=0.14). In S1, 41 pts were treated before the amendment and 38 after the amendment; their 4-yr OS was 41% and 48% (
P
=0.99), and their 4-yr RFS was 39% and 36%, respectively (
P
=0.95). A landmark analysis of pts who achieved remission showed no survival difference between pts who did or did not undergo ASCT, with 4-yr OS of 49% and 48% (
P
=0.98), and 4-yr RFS of 46% and 37% (
P
=0.68), respectively. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) was noted in 10 (9%) pts, and its incidence decreased from 13% with single dose of InO to 2% with lower and fractionated doses of InO (
P
=0.056).
Conclusions:
The combination of mini-HCVD and reduced-dose InO with sequential blina improved the outcomes of pts with R/R ALL. The new treatment schedule resulted in a lower rate of SOS compared to the original schedule. Clinical trial information: NCT01371630.
Patient characteristics.
Characteristic
Median [range] / N (%)
Category
Pre Amendment
N=67
Post Amendment
N=43
Age (yrs)
34 [17-87]
42 [18-79]
Status
S1
S1, Primary Refractory
S1, CRD1 < 12m
S1, CRD1 ≥ 12m
S2
≥ S3
38 (57)
5
17
16
29 (43)
42 (93)
10
9
23
3 (7)
Prior ASCT
19 (28)
2 (5)
Karyotype
Diploid
KMT2Ar
Misc
IM/ND
14 (21)
8 (12)
35 (52)
10 (15)
14 (33)
2 (5)
23 (51)
6 (14)
SOS
9 (13)
1 (2)
3 organizations
7 drugs
6 targets
Drug
mini-Hyper-CVDDrug
blinatumomabDrug
methotrexateDrug
cytarabineDrug
POMPDrug
VarlilumabTarget
methotrexateTarget
BlinatumomabTarget
CD20+Target
POMPTarget
DNA polymerase