Abstract
Use of medical cannabis in cancer-related symptons: A systematic review.
Author
person
Claudia Vaz De Melo Sette
Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brazil
info_outline
Claudia Vaz De Melo Sette, Jean Henri Schoueri, Daniel De Iracema Gomes Cubero, Auro Del Giglio
Full text
Authors
person
Claudia Vaz De Melo Sette
Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brazil
info_outline
Claudia Vaz De Melo Sette, Jean Henri Schoueri, Daniel De Iracema Gomes Cubero, Auro Del Giglio
Organizations
Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brazil, ABC Medical School, Santo André, Brazil, Federal University of the ABC, Santo André, Brazil
Abstract Disclosures
Research Funding
No funding received
None.
Background:
Medical cannabis’ (MC) use is increasing due to its alleged potencial effects amongst various diseases. In this sense, there are many papers trying to demonstrate its benefits in cancer-related symptoms (CRS). However, few randomised controlled trials (RCT) were done to date. This systematic review (SR) aimed to evaluate the eficacy of MC in CRS.
Methods:
We performed a SR acordding to PRISMA guidelines based on PUBMED, EMBASE, LILACS and WEBScience platforms seaching for RCTs using the following terms: medical cannabis OR cannabinoids OR dronabinol OR tetrahydrocannabinol OR AND nausea OR vomiting OR chemotherapy OR cancer OR pain OR cachexia OR anorexia. We included trials from January 2010 to January 2023 that evaluated the association between MC and CRS.
Results:
We found 2097 abstracts, of which 304 were RCTs. After excluding the ones that did not meet the inclusion criteria, repeated articles and non-published trials, we ended up with 9 papers. Most of these studies used oral sprays combination of CBD/THC and the results are heterogeneous as displayed in table 1.
Conclusions:
MC may have a potencial effect in CRS, however more RCTs are needed for current literature presentes low quality evidence for its use. Up to now, there is no clear data to encourage its use.
First Author
Year
Study Desing
Main variable studied
Sample Size (analyzed patients)
Drug Formulation
Drug Active Ingredients Tested
Adverse Effect
Main Adverse Effect
Primary Outcome
Jeremy R. Johnson
2009
Multicenter
Pain
177
oral spray
THC/CBD Vs THC
< 25%
somnolence
Positive
Marta Duran
2010
Multicenter
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
16
oral spray
CBD/THC Vs Placebo
75-100%
somnolence
Positive
T.D. Brisbois
2011
Two centers/sites
Taste and Flavor of Food
21
oral spray
THC Vs Placebo
-
nausea/vomiting
Positive
Russell K. Portenoy
2012
Multicenter
Pain
359
oral spray
THC/CBD Vs Placebo
> 75%
nausea/dizziness
Positive
Mary E. Lynch
2014
One center/site
Neuropathic pain induced by chemotherapy
16
oral spray
CBD Vs Placebo
> 75%
fatigue
Negative
Mathieu Côté
2016
One center/site
Global Quality of Life
32
capsule
CBD Vs Placebo
> 75%
nausea
Negative
Marie T Fallon
2017
Multicenter
Pain
397
oral spray
THC/CBD Vs Placebo
50-75%
somnolence
Negative
Marie T Fallon
2017
Multicenter
Pain
206
oral spray
THC/CBD Vs Placebo
< 25%
somnolence
Negative
Aron T. Lichtman
2018
Multicenter
Pain
397
oral spray
CBD VS Placebo
50-75%
nausea
Negative
P. Grimison
2020
Multicenter
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
78
capsule
THC:CBD Vs Placebo
25-50%
somnolence
Positive
3 organizations
6 drugs
14 targets
Organization
Centro Universitário FMABCOrganization
ABC Medical SchoolOrganization
Federal University of the ABCDrug
medical cannabisDrug
cannabinoidsDrug
dronabinolDrug
carboplatinDrug
THC:CBDTarget
CB2 receptorTarget
CB1Target
THCTarget
GPR55Target
Serotonin receptorsTarget
PPARsTarget
CBDCA-Vp16Target
Vanilloid receptorsTarget
adenosine receptors