Abstract

Phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy versus standard postoperative chemotherapy in HR-negative HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Author
person Meng Xiu National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China info_outline Meng Xiu, Pin Zhang
Full text
Authors person Meng Xiu National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China info_outline Meng Xiu, Pin Zhang Organizations National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China Abstract Disclosures Research Funding Other Foundation Background: HR-/HER2+ breast cancer is a subtype with aggressive characteristic and poor survival. More clinical evidence are needed for choice of therapeutic strategies. Methods: Patients with T1-3N0-3M0 received preoperative chemotherapy (PTX 175 mg/m 2 , CBP AUC 4, q2w*6) combined with trastuzumab (2mg/kg qw) or standard postoperative chemotherapy such as ddAC-PH, AC-PH, TCH. The primary endpoint was RFS. Results: 86 patients were enrolled, 43 received preoperative chemotherapy (pre arm) and the other 43 received postoperative chemotherapy (post arm). There was no significant difference in baseline between the two arms. 22.1% of patients were stage IIA, 25.6% IIB, 34.9% IIIA, and 18.6% IIIC. At a median follow-up of 33.4 months, 16 patients had relapsed (pre arm 8, post arm 8). The median time from diagnosis to relapse was 22.8 months (7.1-49.2) and 23.8 months (11.4-37.4) in pre and post arm. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated that the 3-year RFS were similar (pre vs post: 73.4% vs 75.4%, p = 0.631). Only 1 death occurred in post arm. Table showed that in subgroups, there was no statistical difference in risk of recurrence between pre and post arms. In pre arm, ORR was 97.7% clinically, and pCR (ypT0/TisN0) was 39.0%. No patients achieved pCR relapsed, and the residual invasive lesions indicated poor prognosis. Table showed that Neo-Bioscore 4-5 was related to recurrence event significantly ( p = 0.021). The rate of breast-conserving in pre arm was higher (19.5% vs 9.3%), and PCb regiments every 2 weeks had similar adverse effects with standard chemotherapy, and less patients had dose reductions (18.6% vs 25.6%). Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy versus standard postoperative chemotherapy results in similar RFS among HR-/HER2+ patients. Preoperative chemotherapy can identify prognosis of patients early by Neo-Bioscore and adjuvant therapy should be strengthened for high-risk patients. PCb every 2 weeks combined with trastuzumab can be an option of preoperative therapy for HER2+ breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02934828 Population Comparisons HR 95% CI P value Total Pre vs. Post 1.277 0.469-3.476 0.632 EGFR and CK5/6 - Pre vs. Post 3.877 0.347-43.365 0.271 EGFR or CK5/6 + Pre vs. Post 1.168 0.370-3.688 0.791 Stage II Pre vs. Post 0.845 0.052-13.645 0.906 Stage III Pre vs. Post 1.414 0.475-4.214 0.534 T1-3 N0-1 M0 Pre vs. Post 1.021 0.227-4.580 0.979 Preoperative arm Neo-Bioscore (1-3 vs. 4-5) 0.195 0.049-0.784 0.021 Preoperative arm pCR (yes vs. no) 0.019 0.000-5.967 0.176 Preoperative arm Miller-Payne (1-3 vs. 4-5) 0.265 0.063-1.111 0.069