Patient attendance at molecular tumor board: A new means of shared decision making?

person Timothy Lewis Cannon Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA info_outline Timothy Lewis Cannon, Donald L. Trump, Laura Knopp, Hongkun Wang, Tiffani DeMarco, John Milburn Jessup

Authors person Timothy Lewis Cannon Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA info_outline Timothy Lewis Cannon, Donald L. Trump, Laura Knopp, Hongkun Wang, Tiffani DeMarco, John Milburn Jessup Organizations Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, Inova Translational Medicine Institute, Fairfax, VA Abstract Disclosures Research Funding Other Background: Patient engagement in medical decision-making improves patient related outcomes through compliance and patient satisfaction. The Inova Schar Cancer Institute (ISCI) has a weekly molecular tumor board (MTB) to match comprehensive genomic sequencing results with targeted therapies for patients. The ISCI MTB invites patients to attend and engage in the MTB discussion. We performed a pilot study to investigate the feasibility and satisfaction in patients who attended MTB. Methods: During the time of this study, August 2017 through October 2018, 139 patients were presented and all 20 who were able to attend MTB completed pre-and post- MTB surveys. Patients who did not attend were either not invited by their primary oncologist, unable to attend, or chose not to attend. The survey included six questions related to comprehension, engagement, and satisfaction with the treatment team. Results: There was a statistically significant change for the question “I am satisfied with how well informed I am about targeted therapy” with p = 0.016. All 20 patients answered positively that it was beneficial for them to attend. Many patients expressed concerns about their difficulty understanding the technical aspects of the meeting. Conclusions: Patients who attended MTB reported a higher level of satisfaction after MTB attendance as compared to before MTB. This may reflect a sense of engagement in shared decision making rather than comprehension of genomic information. A more holistic method of studying this practice would include sampling a larger patient population and a formal evaluation of the physicians’ experience with patients attending. Supported by philanthropic funds from the Inova Schar Cancer Institute.