ATTRIBUTES INFLUENCING THE SELECTION OF FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMS BY RHEUMATOLOGY APPLICANTS: A PILOT WEB-BASED SURVEY

Background: Recruitment of candidates is a cost- and effort-intensive aspect of rheumatology fellowship programs. For program leaders to efficiently use the available resources and improve recruitment outcomes, it is imperative to understand the attributes that influence the candidates’ choice of a program. Previous studies have examined the type and relative importance of the factors that candidates use in selecting other fellowship programs (1, 2). However, no such studies have been conducted in the field of rheumatology. Objectives: To examine the factors that influence the selection of fellowship programs by rheumatology applicants. Methods: An anonymous, web-based survey comprised of 13 questions was shared with rheumatology fellowship applicants on messaging applications and online forums. The survey was open from 10/29/2021-11/06/2021. Participation was voluntary and informed consent was implied through the participants’ response. Three reminders to complete the survey were sent. Four domains of the applicant’s perception in relation to their preference of ranking rheumatology programs were assessed: (1) program prestige, (2) program structure, (3) interview day experience, and (4) career path of the alumni. The survey questions were devised in one of the following formats: (1) 5-point Likert scale, (2) rank order questions, (3) yes/no questions, (4) multiple choice questions, and (5) open-ended questions. Results: Thirty-two rheumatology applicants responded to the survey. The prestige of the program was reported to be extremely important by 16%, very important by 19%, somewhat important by 44%, and little or not important by 21% responders. The opportunity to see a diverse patient population was reported to be important by 97% respondents. The call schedule and higher number of fellows were considered important by 88% of the respondents. 66% preferred programs with higher number of faculty members. 69% favored programs with an ultrasound curriculum. The availability of clinician-educator track (18%), MCR/MPH (14%), and T32 grand (4%) were considered less important. 69% reported that the opportunity to train at a Veterans Administration hospital did not influence their choice. Regarding interview day experience, interaction with the faculty (63%) and the fellows (17%) were considered important factors influencing program ranking. Respondents preferred programs with alumni in academic clinician track (45%) and private practice (43%) compared to programs with alumni in academic research (13%) or industry pathway (4%). The geographical location of the program including the cost of living and location of significant others also influenced the applicants’ choice. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey to assess the attributes that influence a candidate’s choice of a rheumatology fellowship program. Our survey demonstrated that a positive interview day experience and program attributes including the opportunity to interact with a diverse patient population, relaxed call schedule, higher number of fellows and faculty, the presence of an ultrasound curriculum, and the location were the dominant factors influencing applicants’ choice of a program. The main limitation of our study is the lack of generalizability due to selection bias. Understanding the factors involved in decision making of the rheumatology fellowship applicants can provide valuable information for both the applicants and the programs and therefore lead to a better match. REFERENCES: [1]Kelm DJ, Skalski JH, Nelson DR, Kashani KB, Lee AS, Wesselius LJ, et al. Attributes Influencing the Selection of Fellowship Programs by Pulmonary and Critical Care Applicants: A Pilot Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):572-4. [2]Caiola E, Litaker D. Factors influencing the selection of general internal medicine fellowship programs: a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(9):656-8. Disclosure of Interests: None declared Citation: , volume 81, supplement 1, year 2022, page 1856Session: Education (Publication Only)