A randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase 3 study of vusolimogene oderparepvec (VO) combined with nivolumab vs treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced melanoma that has progressed on anti–PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4 therapy (IGNYTE-3).

Jason J. Luke UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA info_outline Jason J. Luke, George Kong, Giuseppe Gullo, Caroline Robert

Authors Jason J. Luke UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA info_outline Jason J. Luke, George Kong, Giuseppe Gullo, Caroline Robert Organizations UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, Replimune, Inc., Woburn, MA, Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France Abstract Disclosures Research Funding Replimune, Inc. Background: Melanoma is the 5 th most common cancer type, with ~100,000 new cases and ~8,000 deaths estimated in the US for 2024. First-line systemic treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors improved the objective response rate (ORR) and extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced disease. The combination of anti–PD-1 nivolumab (nivo) + anti–CTLA-4 ipilimumab (ipi) therapy is associated with the highest ORR and best PFS and OS in this setting. However, only about half of patients respond, and there is no standard of care for patients who progress after anti–PD-1–based therapy. VO (also referred to as RP1) is a selectively replication-competent HSV-1 oncolytic virus that expresses human GM-CSF and a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP-R–). Preliminary data from the phase 1/2 study (IGNYTE) showed that intratumoral (IT) VO plus intravenous (IV) nivolumab (nivo) was well tolerated and had meaningful antitumor activity (ORR, 31.4%) with durable responses in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed on prior anti–PD-1 therapy. This phase 3 study will evaluate the overall survival and clinical benefit as well as the safety of VO plus nivo for patients with advanced melanoma whose disease has progressed after receiving anti–PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4 therapy (or who are not eligible for anti–CTLA-4 therapy in addition to anti–PD-1) versus physician’s choice. Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial comparing VO in combination with nivo vs physician’s choice of treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥12 years, stage IIIb–IV/M1a–M1d cutaneous melanoma, confirmed disease progression on an anti–PD–1 and anti–CTLA-4 treatment (administered in combination or in sequence with anti–PD-1 last), at least 1 measurable tumor (≥1 cm), and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Patients who are not candidates for anti–CTLA-4 therapy may enroll if they have confirmed progression on anti–PD-1 therapy. Patients with BRAF V600 mutant melanoma must have received an anti-BRAF + anti-MEK targeted therapy prior to enrollment. Patients (N = ~400) will be randomized 1:1 to receive VO plus nivo or physician’s choice (nivo + relatlimab, anti–PD–1 monotherapy rechallenge [nivo or pembrolizumab], or single-agent chemotherapy [dacarbazine, temozolomide, or paclitaxel/albumin-bound paclitaxel]). VO is given IT Q2W; nivo is administered IV at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W starting with the 2 nd dose of VO. The primary endpoint of the study is OS; the key secondary endpoints are PFS and ORR. Additional endpoints include complete response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT06264180.