Abstract

Assessing our adherence to bone protection standards in metastatic prostate cancer in the largest Irish center: Are we falling behind?

Author
person Razia Aslam St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland info_outline Razia Aslam, Danial Hadi, Syed Muhammad Bilal Shah, Emma Barron
Full text
Authors person Razia Aslam St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland info_outline Razia Aslam, Danial Hadi, Syed Muhammad Bilal Shah, Emma Barron Organizations St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, St. James Hospital, Dublin, xx, Ireland Abstract Disclosures Research Funding No funding sources reported Background: Prostate cancer ranks as the second most prevalent cancer in men globally, often necessitating androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as part of its treatment. While ADT effectively diminishes testosterone levels, a vital factor in prostate cancer cell growth, it concurrently poses a notable side effect – an accelerated rate of bone loss. This heightened bone loss elevates the vulnerability of patients to osteoporosis and fractures. The optimization of bone health entails early identification of patients susceptible to osteoporosis and fractures, the implementation of preventative measures, and prompt interventions to mitigate bone loss and fracture risks. Methods: The audit aims to evaluate adherence to established guidelines, such as those outlined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), concerning the assessment and optimization of bone health. A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of prostate cancer patients who underwent Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) at St James Hospital in Dublin. Pertinent data, encompassing patient demographics, duration of ADT, documentation of bone health assessment, frequency of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) testing, utilization of preventive measures (e.g., calcium and vitamin D supplementation), and any interventions for bone health optimization (such as bisphosphonate therapy and denosumab), was systematically collected. Results: A comprehensive review encompassed 57 patients, revealing that 38 patients (67%) exhibited metastatic disease. Among them, 42 patients (74%) presented with castrate-sensitive disease. Out of the total, 24 patients (42%) underwent a baseline Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Results indicated that 12 patients were diagnosed with Osteoporosis, 9 with Osteopenia, and 3 with normal Bone Mineral Density (BMD). At baseline, 26 patients (46%) initiated Calcium and Vitamin D supplements, while 12 patients (21%) commenced Bisphosphonates/Denosumab based on DEXA scan outcomes. Notably, 8 (14%) patients experienced a skeletal/bone-related event which is much higher than reported in literature. Conclusions: The findings are intended to guide healthcare professionals in optimizing bone health strategies, with the ultimate goal of improving patients' quality of life and minimizing the risk of fractures and related complications. Identified areas for improvement in clinical practices will be addressed by implementing recommended recommendations, aiming to enhance patient care, decrease the risk of osteoporosis and fractures, and overall improve patient outcomes. A re-audit is planned to monitor ongoing adherence to guidelines and assess the impact of interventions implemented as a result of this study.

1 organization

Organization
xx